What the Professor Says vs. What the Professr Means


What the Professor says.

What the Professor means.
Tell me what you like to be called. Who are you?
How do you spell your name? Who are you?
Please follow these guidelines and you’ll do fine in this class. Don’t cross me you maggots.
We will be using one of the leading textbooks in the field. We will be using my textbook.
The gist of the theoretical framework is what’s most important. I don’t understand the details either.
Most scholars believe that . . . I believe that . . .
Ask me that question in another way. Try being coherent this time.
There are no stupid questions. But there are stupid students.
You’ll have to see me during office hours for analysis of that issue. I don’t have a clue.
That issue is beyond the scope of this class. I really don’t have a clue.
Today we are going to discuss a critical research topic. Today we are going to discuss one of my articles.
Unfortunately, we don’t have the time to study all the scholars who have made contributions in this area. We will not be covering the work of people whose ideas differ from mine.
We can continue this discussion at another time. This has nothing to do with anything you moron.
We can continue this discussion at another time. Ok, you win.
We can continue this discussion at another time. I have nothing else to say about this topic.
Today we’ll let a member of the class lead the discussion. I was busy revising an article and didn’t prepare for class.
What did Piaget say on this point? Did anyone do the assigned reading?
That’s an interesting point of view. What incredible nonsense.
You think so? I don’t.
The implications of this study are clear I don’t know what it means either, but there’ll be a question about it on the test.
The test will be primarily multiple choice questions. The test will be 60 multiple choice questions, 30 true-false items, 15 fill-in-the blanks, 10 short-answer, and three essays.
Keep in mind that this was a challenging exam No one scored above a C-.
The test scores were a little below my expectations. No one is going to accuse me of grade inflation this term.
I’ll certainly give that some consideration. Not a chance.
I’m sorry about your grandmother. Wait till you see the make-up exam.
Any further questions? I’m ready to go.
It’s been very rewarding to teach this class. I hope they find someone else to teach it next term.
You should probably get a reference letter from someone who’s had you in more than one class. Who are you?

What “PhD” Really Stands for…

What “PhD” Really Stands for…

* P h D
* Patiently hoping for a Degree
* Piled higher and Deeper
* Professorship? hah! Dream on!
* Please hire. Desperate.
* Physiologically Deficient
* Pour him (or her) a Drink
* Philosophically Disturbed
* Probably headed for Divorce
* Pathetically hopeless Dweeb
* Probably heavily in Debt
* Parents have Doubts
* Professors had Doubts
* Pheromone Deprived
* Probably hard to Describe
* Patiently headed Downhill…
* Permanent head Damage
* Pulsating heaving Disaster?
* Pretty homely Dork
* Potential heavy Drinker
* Professional hamburger Dispenser
* Post hole Digger
* Professional hair Dresser
* Progressive heart Doctor
* Professional humidity Detector
* Piano hauling Done
* Pro at hurling Darts
* Professional hugger of Dames
* Private house Detective
* Pizza hut Driver
* Pretty heavily Depressed
* Prozac handouts Desired
* Pretty heavy Diploma
* Pathetic homeless Dreamer
* Please hold Dangerous
* Permanently held Dear
* Proudly half Dead
* Promised hell Down-the-road
* Precisely helping Deadheads
* Processed here, Dammit
* Probably heavenly Death

Qualifying Exam Questions from MIT

Qualifying Exam Questions from MIT
If
you think you have it tough, have a look at a pool of questions from
various disciplines on MIT’s doctoral qualifying examinations. These
are actual questions that students in the past have had to answer. They
are allowed four hours, and they have four sets of questions like these
over two days.

————————————————————–

History
Describe
the history of the papacy from its origins to the present day;
concentrate especially but not exclusively on the social, political,
economic, religious, and philosophical impact on Europe, Asia, America,
and Africa. Be brief, concise, and specific.

Medicine
You
have been provided with a razor blade, a piece of gauze, and a bottle
of Scotch. Remove your own appendix. Do not suture until your work has
been inspected.

Public Speaking
2,500 riot-crazed aborigines are storming the classroom. Calm them. You may use any ancient language except Latin or Greek.

Biology
Create
life. Estimate the differences in subsequent human culture if this form
of life had developed 500 million years earlier, with special attention
to the probable effects on the English parliamentary system. Prove your
thesis.

Music
Write a piano concerto. Orchestrate it and perform it with flute and drum. You will find a piano under your seat.

Psychology
Based
on your knowledge of their works, evaluate the emotional stability,
degree of adjustment, and repressed frustrations of each of the
following: Alexander of Aphrodisias, Ramses II, Hammurabi. Support your
evaluation with quotations from each man’s work, making appropriate
references. It is not necessary to translate.

Sociology
Estimate the sociological problems that might accompany the end of the world. Construct an experiment to test your theory.

Management Science
Define
management. Define science. How do they relate? Why? Create a
generalized algorithm to optimize all managerial decisions. Assuming an
1130 CPU supporting 50 terminals, each terminal to activate your
algorithm, design the communications interface and all the necessary
control programs.

Economics
Develop a realistic plan for
refinancing the national debt. Trace the possible effects of your plan
in the following areas: Cubism, the Donatist controversy, the wave
theory of light. Outline a method from all points of view. Point out
the deficiencies in your point of view, as demonstrated in your answer
to the last question.

Political Science
There is a red telephone on the desk beside you. Start World War III. Report at length on its socio-political effects, if any.

Epistemology
Take a position for or against the truth. Prove the validity of your position.

Physics
Explain the nature of matter. Include in your answer an evaluation of the impact of the development of mathematics on science.

Chemistry
Transform
lead into gold. You will find a tripod and three lead tubes under your
seat. Show all work including Feynman diagrams and quantum functions
for all steps. You have fifteen minutes.

Philosophy
Sketch the development of human thought; estimate its significance. Compare with the development of any other kind of thought.

GRADUATE STUDENT SURVIVAL GUIDE

GRADUATE STUDENT SURVIVAL GUIDE
What every doctoral student should know

————————————————————–
THE DISSERTATION DECATHLON
Picking a Topic – When considering a topic, test it with the following questions.
Do
I really have an interest in the topic? This is the most fundamental
question. If you are going to devote several years of your life to “The
Role of Inductive Thinking in Kindergarten Dropouts,” you’d best have
an ardent interest in inductive thinking. And in kindergarten dropouts.
Graduate students’ interests can shift quickly. Your ability to sustain
your interest is the single most important factor in determining
whether or not you finish.

How long will it take me to finish?
Estimate the absolute maximum amount of time you can stand to remain a
student. Then figure as precisely as possible how much time it will
take you to complete the proposed project if everything goes according
to plan. Triple it.

Is this topic being forced on me?
Professors love to have their students research topics that are of no
interest to them. Look deep into your professor’s soul. Think
carefully; if you are being manipulated and don’t really have an
interest, slide out.

Is it possible to conduct this study? Every
field has fascinating questions that have never been answered because
they are impossible to answer with the available methods and
technology. Think about why other researchers haven’t attempted your
topic. If it falls into the mission impossible category, see if there
is a simpler, related problem or piece of the question you could answer
without biting off the whole thing.

Do I have the resources to
conduct the research? Don’t underestimate the expense of conducting
research both in time and money. Not to mention hassle. Students are
always unpleasantly surprised at just what it costs to have their
dissertations typed, copied, and bound. Not to mention duplicating
countless drafts, photocopying articles, postage. Do a budget.

Do
I have the necessary background and expertise to handle my topic? If
your question is such that it will require hierarchical linear modeling
and you have a tenuous hold on the eternal mysteries of the t-test,
it’s time for self-reflection.

Is my topic timely, and is it
likely to remain so (at least in the near future)? By the time you
complete your course work and pass your orals, you may find that your
topic has lost its luster.

Can I get the faculty support I need?
No one completes a dissertation without substantial support from the
faculty. If a faculty member does not have an active interest and
expertise in your specialty, you may be in trouble. Besides not being
able to help, professors’ lack of knowledge about your project may
cause them to demand the impossible or insist on things that are
detrimental to the study. If your advisor isn’t interested in your
topic or simply doesn’t have the time for you, look around for someone
who is and does.

Does my topic have career potential? The career
potential of a topic is hard to predict. Academia is fickle. Topics to
avoid are such things as rehashing your advisor’s dissertation or
picking up topics that have recently gone out of vogue. Ask yourself if
valuable articles can be drawn from your dissertation. Remember that,
when you interview for a position, you will need to make a
presentation, and it is likely that this presentation will deal with
your dissertation.

————————————————————–
THE TEN COMMANDMENTS FOR A DISSERTATION
The creation of knowledge is thine only goal; thou shalt have no other goals before it.

Thou shalt value research over teaching and publishing above all else.

Thou shalt honor theory over the practical.

Thou shalt not criticize thy chairperson’s work.

Thou shalt gratefully and humbly accept all criticism of thine own work.

Thou shalt willingly share publications produced by your dissertation with your chair.

Thy chairperson’s ideological and theoretical prejudices shall be thy prejudices.

Thou shalt not complain about poverty, family problems, or poor job prospects.

Thou shalt read the literature, memorize the literature, and cite the literature on command.

Thou shalt not break the commandments in the presence of thy chairperson.

————————————————————–
THE FOUR DEADLY SINS
The
sin of stubbornness. The irrational refusal to make any changes or
accept criticism from any source. While this may merely alienate your
fellow graduate students, it can be fatal when dealing with your
committee. Remember that professors are like the IRS; when they examine
something, they are determined to find something wrong.

The
sin of compliancy. This is the willingness to do anything that your
committee asks. They will then think you are immature and lack good
judgment. Or spunk. By trying to please everyone you are more likely to
alienate everyone.

The sin of comparison. This undercuts motivation and leads to counterproductive competition and sloth. Everyone can win.

The sin of procrastination. I’ll discuss this next week.

————————————————————–
ON SELECTING A COMMITTEE
Choose professors with whom you get along personally. You will often need to rely on the compassion of committee members.

Choose
professors who have time for you and who are interested in you, in your
welfare, and in your work. Your work cannot evaluate itself. Find
people who will guide, evaluate, edit your writing, and critique your
ideas.

Select professors who get along with each other. Even if they get along with you, feuding members will slow your progress.

Choose
professors who are genuinely interested in your dissertation topic and
can provide you with technical help, especially in the area of data
analysis.

Choose professors who know how to balance their demand
for academic rigor with your need for patience, assistance, and
compassion.

Choose professors who may be able to help you with
your career after graduation. Hard as it seems to believe, there is a
life after the dissertation.

————————————————————–

With thanks to Richard W. Moore, who wrote the wonderful Winning the PHD Game.

One last word:

If you’re smart enough to get a PhD,
you ought to be smart enough to know how to get a PhD.

Things to Say and Do Guaranteed to Spice up Your Thesis and Dissertation Defenses

Things to Say and Do Guaranteed to Spice up Your Thesis and Dissertation Defenses

1. Begin the defense by charging a cover and checking for ID.

2. Charge a two-drink minimum.

3. Begin with “Ladies and Gentlemen, please rise for the singing of our National Anthem.”

4.
Follow that with a joke that starts with “Which reminds me of a story –
A Black guy, a Chinese guy, and a Jew walked into a bar…”

5. Bring coffee and charge 25 cents a cup.

6. “Charge the mound” when a professor beans you with a high fast question.

7. Describe parts of your dissertation using interpretive dance.

8. Lead your committee members in a Wave.

9. Break the tension at appropriate moments with a sing-a-long.

10. Answer tough queries with “You call THAT a question? How’d you ever get to be a professor?”

11. Have bodyguards outside the room to discourage attendance of certain professors.

12. Present your defense using puppets.

13. Before you begin your presentation, sell T-shirts to recoup the cost of copying, binding, etc.

14.In addition, pass a collection basket.

15. Answer complex issues in mime.

16. Use the ocassion to hold a Tupperware party.

17. Have bikini-clad models in charge of changing your overheads

18. At approximately the mid-point of your defense bring out maracas and shout “Everybody rumba!!”

19. Explain nonsignificant findings with “It would have worked if it weren’t for those f*%ing kids.”

20. Refuse to answer tough questions “in protest of our government’s systematic and brutal opression of minorities.”

21. Offer door prizes and conduct a raffle.

22. Ask professors to “Please phrase your question in the form of an answer.”

23. Interrupt every 15 minutes with the announcement “And now, a word from our sponsor.”

24. Present critical parts of your defense in iambic pentameter.

25. In your announcement, inform your committee that it will be a black tie affair.

26. Hire the Goodyear Blimp to circle the building.

27. Announce to your committee that “There will be a short quiz after my presentation.”

28. Bring your pet boa.

29. Bring snacks and start a food fight.

30. Slap your committee chair with a glove and challenge him to a duel.

31. Arrange for a halftime show.

32. Bring a big foam hand that says “I’m #1.”

33. Pass out souvenier matchbooks.

34. Hang a pinata over the table and hire a strolling mariachi band.

35. Make each professor remove an item of clothing for each question asked.

36. Use a Greek Chorus to highlight important points.

37. When necessary, say “I’m sorry Professor Smith, I didn’t say ‘SIMON SAYS any questions?’. You’re out.”

38. Dress in top hat and tails.

39. Hold a pre-defense pep rally, complete with cheerleaders, pep band, and a bonfire.

40. If you sense that things are not going well, threaten to detonate a small nuclear device in the room.

41. Show slides of your last vacation.

42.
Put your overheads on a film strip. Designate a professor to be in
charge of turning the strip when the tape recording beeps.

43.
If members of the committee begin to argue among themselves announce:
“OK, everybody – heads down on the desk until you show me you can
behave.”

44. When in trouble, begin speaking in tongues.

45. Answer every question with a question.

46. Hand out 3-D glasses.

47. Announce credits at the end. Include a “key grip” and a “best boy.”

48. Make a practice of replying, “Sure, I could answer that, but then I’d have to kill you.”

49.
Ask a friend and conspirator to attend and ask the first question. Draw
a blank-loaded gun and “shoot” him. Have him make a great scene of
dying. Be sure to include fake blood. Turn to your committee and ask
“Other questions?”

50. Wear clown makeup, a clown wig, clown shoes, a clown nose, and nothing else.

51. Install “APPLAUSE” and “LAUGHTER” signs.

52. Use a TelePromTer

53. Alter the clocks in the room and begin your defense 15 minutes before anyone arrives.

내면적 성전, 외면적 성전

오늘 성경공부 중에서 내면적 (보이지 않는) 성전과 외면적 (보이는) 성전의 비교가 계속 제 마음에 맴돌고 있습니다. 지금은 자정이 조금 지난 시간인데도요.

요즈음은 자꾸만,
왜 하나님께서 이스라엘 백성들에게… 그 많은 오해를 불러 일으키실 수 있는…
‘외형적 성전’, ‘율법’ 등등을 주셨을까.
그 수많은 종교적 규례를, 따라야할 법칙들, 하나님의 뜻을 ‘상징’하는 많은 물건과 예식들…

예수님께서 그것들을 깨고자 그리도 노력하셨건만 결국 그것을 깨시지 못하시고 그 많은 종교적 규례들에 의해 오히려 accuse 되셔서 십자가에 달리셨지요.

아니..
도대체 왜 그리 하셨을까.. 왜 하나님께서는 수 많은 종교적 규례들을 그리도 두셨을까.

요즈음 자꾸 드는 생각은요,
교육적 필요 때문이었다는 생각입니다.

도무지 하나님을 제대로 알지 못하던 이스라엘 백성들에게..
몇천년의 시간을 두고서 끊임없이 성전, 제사, 율법 등을 강조하심으로써, 하나님이 어떤 분이신지를 알기를 원하셨다는 거지요.
가령 십일조를 꼬박 꼬박 내면서, 내 수입과 재산의 모든 것이 하나님 것임을 계속 상기하고 그렇게 살라는 의미에서 십일조 규례를 주신 것이라는 것이죠.

그런데,
저는 사실… 개인적으로 그 율법적 종교적 기독교가 복음의 생명성을 죽이는 주범이라고 생각해 왔기 때문에 (지금도 그 생각엔 변함이 없습니다.)
때로 지나친 반형식론적 입장을 취해왔던 것 같습니다.

예배로 마음으로 드리는게 중요하지, 주일 예배라는 형식을 그리 중요하지 않다.
십일조도 내 소유의 전체가 하나님 것임을 인정하고 사는 것이 더 중요하지 십일조라는 형식은 중요하지 않다.
기도도 하나님과 대화하고 내 마음을 올려드리는 것이 중요하지 어떤 형식은 중요하지 않다.

그.런.데…

제가 이렇게 생각한 데에는 커다란 교.만. 이 자리잡고 있었음을 요즈음 많이 생각하게 됩니다.

그것은,
제가 그런 형식을 전혀 필요로 하지 않을만큼 성숙하지 않다는 것입니다.
저는 예배의 형식을 무시할만큼 예배가 제 살을 지배하는 사람도 아니고,
십일조라는 형식을 무시할만큼 제 재물의 주인을 하나님으로 인정하는 사람도 아니고,
기도의 형식을 무시할만큼 하나님과의 친밀한 교제속에 살고 있는 사람도 아니라는 것입니다.

….

어린 아이들에게는 부모가 더 엄하게, 많은 rule들에 의해 control하지만
그 아이가 장성해 감에 따라 밤 귀가 시간도 점점 늦추어 주고,
때로는 부모의 credit card를 쓰게 허락해주기도 하고,
일정 나이가 지나면 미성년자 관람불가 영화를 보는 것도 허락하는 것 처럼…

어쩌면 제 신앙의 성숙(?)에 따라 때로는 불필요해보이는 형식을 제게 일부러 덧씌울 필요가 있을 수도 있는 것인데…
너무도 그것을 무시하면서 살고 있지는 않았나 하는 그런 생각을을 했었습니다.

글쎄요…
정말 어떤 의미에선… 이젠 ‘짬밥’도 늘어서…
제가 배운대로 혹은 성경대로 설교가 되지 않으면 설교 자체에 귀를 닫아버리고…
어떤 사람이 성경공부 시간에 엉뚱한 이야기를 하면 그 이야기를 어떻게 하면 뒤엎을 수 있을까 하는 생각을 자동적으로 떠올리는…
그런 바리새인이 되어버린 것 같은 생각이 자꾸 듭니다.

정말 빌립보서의 말씀 글자 그대로…
‘자기보다 남을 낫게 여기고’… 이것을 뼈속 깊이 새기고 사는 것이 참 쉽지 않네요.

겸손하지 못한 것으로 보나,
정직하지 못한 것으로 보나,
사랑하지 못하는 것으로 보나,
절제하지 못하는 것으로 보나,
오래 참지 못하는 것으로 보나,
온유하지 못한 것으로 보나,

여러가지로 보아…
적어도 제겐 아직은 신앙생활의 많은 부분에서 ‘외면적 성전’이 때로 강조되어야 하는 것은 아닌가 하는 생각을 해 봅니다.

2004년 1월,
http://www.gatebiblestudy.org 보드에 쓴 글